1. Relying on Ghulam Sakina and others v. The State (1991 PCr.LJ 1316) and also Mst. Nusrat v. The State (1996 SCM R 973), the learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that although Mst. Nasreen Akhtar petitioner has been accused of murder yet she is entitled to grant of bail as the welfare of suckling child demands that her mother should be in a position to look after the child properly and the child should not suffer in jail for the murder committed by his mother and that the release of the mother was such ground would be in furtherance of principles of justice expounded under Islamic Criminal Law. He states further that the petitioner does not want to press her bail on the other grounds taken in the petition.
2. 2.The learned State counsel concedes that the petitioner has a suckling child aged hardly about I year.
3. 3.I have had the privilege of going through the authorities cited at the bar and I feel inclined to grant the petitioner bail merely on the ground that the welfare of the suckling child so demands and that the child should not be made to suffer in jail for the murder allegedly committed by his mother. In these circumstances, the petitioner is enlarged on bail subject to her furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs,1,00,000 with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar (Judi.) of this Court.