Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1991 P Cr. L J 1316

GHULAM SAKINA And Others vs THE STATE

Citation1991 P Cr. L J 1316
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No.1021/B of 1990
Date1990-01-01
Judge(s)Muhammad Munir Khan
ResultBail granted

ORDER

The report submitted by the Superintendent Women Jail, Multan, reveals that 30 women having minor children are detained in Women Jail Multan. Out of them 18 women are under-trial prisoners and the remaining are convicts.

2. After hearing the learned Additional Advocate-General, I find that the under-trial prisoners women namely Mst. Ghulam Sakina, Mst. Zahooran, Mst. Fatima, Mst, Sughran, Mst. Bashiran, Mst.

Gullan Mai, Mst. Shah Mai, Mst. Husina, Mst. Zubida Parvcen, Mst. Zarina daughter of Waryam, Mst.

Hafizan, Mst. Zainab, Mst. Zarina daughter of Mehmood and Mst. Irshad Bibi, mentioned at Serial Nos. 1, 2. 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 of the list of "under trial female prisoners confined in Women Jail Multan" supplied by Superintendent Women Jail, Multan, are carrying children aged 2 months to the age of 2 years. Their case fall within second proviso to section 497, Cr.P.C. I feel that for the reasons given by me in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1112-B of 1990, the aforesaid women accused are entitled to be released from jail. So, they are allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court trying them.

3. Copy of this order alongwith the Photostat copy of the list of undertrial prisoners marked 'A' shall immediately be sent to Superintendent Women Jail, Multan for information to the under-trial prisoners concerned. Copy of this order alongwith the copies of the list of the female prisoners marked `A' shall be sent to Duty Magistrate, Multan, Resident Magistrate, Multan, Resident Magistrate, Mailsi. Sessions Judge. Multan. Additional Sessions Judge, Camp at Shujabad, Additional Sessions Judge Camp at Mian Channu, Sessions Judge, Muzaffargarh. Resident Magistrate, Muzaffargarh, Assistant Commissioner, Mian Channu, Resident Magistrate, Layyah and Sessions Judge, Vehari, for compliance.

4. As for the women convicted under Hudood Ordinance, this Court has no jurisdiction to suspend the execution of sentence. They may approach the Federal Shariat Court, if so advised.

5. As for the femals convicted under various sections of Pakistan Penal Code, the learned Additional Advocate-General wants to examine their cases.

The learned Additional Advocate-General will procure the list of all women who are pregnant or having suckling babies with them and are lodged in various jails of the Province of Punjab.

Inspector-General Prisons, Punjab, will depute the Officer not below the rank of D.I.-G. Prisons to assist the learned Additional Advocate-General and also appear before the Court on next date.

6. As for the women detained in district jails within the local jurisdiction of Multan Bench, learned Sessions Judge of the district will inspect the jail concerned in accordance with the High Court Rules and Orders and may pass orders in the light of the observations made by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1115-B of 1990. They shall protect/watch the welfare of the suckling babies and minor children detained in jails just like real mother. Needless to add that the Courts enjoy unlimited powers in this behalf.

7. Copy of this order alongwith the copy of the order passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1112-B of 1990, be sent to the learned Sessions Judge, Sahiwal, Khanewal, Vehari, Dera Ghazi Khan, Muzaffargarh, Layyah and Rajanpur, for compliance.

8. For further proceedings, this case may be placed before me in the second week of January, 1991 at the Bench/Seat where I may be functioning at the time after obtaining the orders of my Lord, the Chief Justice, if necessary.

Cited by 5 cases

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch