Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1977 P Cr. L J 671

Karachi.' MUHAMMAD AZEEM vs THE STATE

Citation1977 P Cr. L J 671
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Appeal No. J-285 of 1975
Date1976-06-02
Judge(s)Mushtaq Ali Kazi
ResultAppeal allowed

' The appellant has been convicted by Additional Sessions Judge, Jacobabad for offence under section 13-D, Arms Ordinance, for having been in possession of unlicensed single-barrel shot-gun and cartridges of 12 bore, and he has been sentenced to undergo R. I. For 2 years.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that on 15-9-1973 Mr. Nazeer Hussain S. H.

0., Kashmore Police Station while on patrol duty at 7th mile of protection bund of Gehalpur found the present appellant coming from the western side at about 10-30 p.m. With a gun in his hand. He was challenged and caught and the 12 bore gun with 5 live cartridges was recovered from his possession. A. S. I. Aitabar Khan and Head Constable Abdul Hakim acted as Masbirs. The case was then registered against the appellant who was sent up in Court and convicted as above. He has appealed from Jail.

3. The version of the appellant is that he is innocent and he has been got implicated by his Zamindar who used to visit his hutment. He had objected to the visits of the Zamindar to his house.

Zamindar had therefore got him falsely implicated with the help of the police.

4. Besides the S. H.

0. Who is the complainant in this case, only one witness Aitabar Khan who was an A. S. I. At that time, has been examined as Mashir. The copy of the station-diary entry has not been produced to show that the S. H.

0. Had actually left the police station at that hour on partol duty. Usually during Nakabandi operations Mashirs from the public are also taken but in the present case not a single independent Mashir has been cited. The appellant is a Sheikh by caste and ordinarily Sheikhs do not go about carrying arms. Mr. Habibur Rashid appearing for the State frankly states that there are only two police officers appearing as witnesses in this case and the facts and circumstances go to show that the prosecution story is entirely doubtful. That the possibility of the appellant having been A falsely implicated in a case of this nature cannot be excluded. Benefit of reasonable doubt is accordingly allowed to the appellant and his conviction! And sentence are set aside. The appeal is accepted. The appellant may be released if not required in any other case.

Cited by 6 cases

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch