Pakistan Case Law← Search
PLD 1997 Peshawar 11

MAZULLAH KHAN vs THE STATE and anothers

CitationPLD 1997 Peshawar 11
CourtPeshawar High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No,560 of 1996
Date1996-08-17
Judge(s)Mian Muhammad Ajmal
ResultBail allowed

1. ' Mazullah Khan accused petitioner, after failing to obtain bail from the learned Courts below had come up to this Court for the same relief in case F.I.R. No,248 dated 21-5-1996, registered at Police Station Saddar, Kohat under section 337-D/34, P.P.C.

2. 2 According to the F.I.R., Abdul Qasim injured complainant, on the day of occurrence at about 15-30 hours, was present near his house along with his grandson Fazal Hakim, when Mazullah Khan and Wajib Khan came and asked him as to why he deposed against them in the Court of Civil Judge.

3. They exchanged hot words, in consequence whereof Mazullah Khan hurled a stone on the complainant and Wajib Khan gave him an axe blow, with which he got injured.

4. 3 I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record of the case with their assistance.

5. 4 The petitioner had been charged for causing stone injury to the complainant but the seat and locale of the said injury was not specified, hence it cannot be ascertained at this stage as to which of the three injuries, was caused by the petitioner as all of them have been caused by the blunt means. This kind of hurt would fall under clause (v) of section 337-F, P.P.C. Which entail the punishment of Daman and may also be imposed imprisonment which may extend to five years as Ta'zir, as provided under section 337-F(V), P.P.C.. The reading of the above section would manifest that the main punishment for the offence is the payment of Daman as it is mandatory in nature while the imposition of imprisonment under Ta'zir is discretionary. After trial, under subsection (2) of section 337-Y, in case of non-payment of Daman the convict can be kept in jail until its recovery from him, or he can be released on bail if he furnishes security equal to the amount of Daman to the satisfaction of the Court. In punishment under Ta'zir is concerned, ii can be enforced under subsection (2) of section 337-N which reads as under:-- (a)

6. (b)

7. (c)

8. (d)

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in this chapter in all cases of hurt, the Court may, having regard to the kind of hurt caused by him in addition to payment of Arsh, award Ta'zir to an offender who is previous convict, habitual or hardened desperate or dangerous criminal."

9. In view of the above legal position, the petitioner can be released on bail provided he furnishes security equivalent to the Daman amount, which tentatively is fixed at Rs,20,000. Consequently the petitioner is allowed bail provided he furnishes bail bonds allowed bail provided he furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs,50,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Illaqa Magistrate who shall see that the sureties are reliable, local and men of means. The accused petitioner shall also deposit Rs,20,000 in cash as 'Daman' to be paid on determination to the complainant on the conclusion of the trial and should also deposit passport which shall remain in the custody of the Court till decision of the case.

Cited by 64 cases

…and 14 more citing cases

For educational and research use only β€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerΒ·PrivacyΒ·TermsΒ·Search