1. ' ABDUL RAHIM KAZI, J.---The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that for the reasons mentioned in the accompanying affidavit the petitioner could not furnish the Bank Guarantee earlier in terms of order passed on 20-7-1994 and, therefore, they request for time. Mr. M.G. Hassan, the learned counsel for the respondent No, 2 has vehemently opposed this request and has pointed out that in a similar petition (C.P. No, D-1157 of 1993) a Division Bench of this Court has passed the orders refusing to grant extension for furnishing of security. He has placed copy of the said order on the record. We have gone through the said order. The order shows that the point dilated upon in the said order was as to whether after lapse of six (6) months the interim stay granted could be continued under Article 199 (4-A) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. As against this Mr. Muhammad Farogh Nassem, Advocate for the petitioner has urged that in the present case the order as passed on 20-7-1994 shows that the said order was conditional orders subject to furnishing of the Bank Guarantee and, therefore, the orders passed in the abovesaid Constitution Petition have no relevance to the present case He has further submitted that in such case the stay would become operative on furnishing of the Bank Guarantee as directed in the earlier order. Reliance is placed on the case reported in (1983 CLC 219).
2. In this view of the matter, without going into the merits, we are inclined to extend the time for reasons mentioned in the accompanying affidavit. The petitioner will furnish Bank Guarantee positively within three weeks from the date of this order.