ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY, J.---Leave to appear is sought against the order of the High Court dated 29-7-.1990.
The facts, in brief, are that the respondents 1 to 7 filed a suit for declaration and possession against the petitioners and respondents Nos. 8 to 11. The petitioners moved an application under Order VI, Rule 17, C.P.C. Seeking permission to amend the written statement. The trial Court vide Order dated 29-3-1989 disallowed the application for amendment. The petitioners' Revision Petition against the said order was dismissed by the District Judge on 17-1-1990. The petitioners then challenged the two orders in a Constitution Petition in the High Court. The petition was dismissed. The learned High Court observed that a revisional order arising out of civil litigation could not be challenged in the Writ Petition and relied upon Ghulam Hussain v. Malik Shahbaz Khan 1985 SCMR 1925; Muhammad Bakhsh v. Ghulam Hussain 1989 SCMR 443 and Muhammad Zahoor v. Lal Muhammad 1988 SCMR 322.
3. The order' of the High Court in the circumstances is not open to challenge on any legal ground.
The order was legal and proper. No point of law is involved in this petition. The petition is dismissed and leave to appeal is refused. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.