1. ' SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--The petitioners are aggrieved by the dismissal of their constitution petition by the High Court whereby it declined to interfere with the order of the Board of Revenue affirming the order of the Additional Commissioner who had made certain adjustments in the consolidation scheme as a result of which the petitioners were deprived of certain fields falling in Nian area. It was not their case that as a result of these adjustments they were given less land than their actual entilements. It has already been held by this Court that the orders made by the Consolidation authorities with regard to allocation of land A are not fit matters which can he agitated in writ jurisdiction; see Muhammad Hussain Munir v. Sikandcr (PLD 1974 S.C. 139). The High Court was therefore justified in dismissing the Constitution petition of the petitioners. Leave is refused.