Pakistan Case Law← Search
1983 PLC 306

MESSRS PAKISTAN PAPERSACK CORPORATION LTD. vs MUHAMMAD

Citation1983 PLC 306
CourtLabour Appellate Tribunal
Case No.Applications Nos. KAR-568 and KAR-569 of 1982
Date1980-11-27
Judge(s)Z. A. Channa
ResultRevision disposed of

DECISION The respondent, who was employed by the appellants as Motor vehicle driver, was dismissed from service by an order dated 10-2-1982 the- res--pondent challenged the orders of his dismissal from service through a grie--vance petition filed before the learned Labour Court in which he named two separate respondents, Messrs. Pak Paper Sack Corporation Limited and Messrs Baluchistan Laminates, which are stated to be two separate divisions of the same company. The grievance petition: of the respondent was resisted by both the above divisions of Pakistan Paper Sack Corporation Limited on the ground of want of jurisdiction. It is their case that at the time of the respondents dismissal from service he was employed in their factory at Hub Chowki, which is outside the Province of Sind, and hence not within the jurisdiction of the learned Fifth Labour Court . The learned Fifth Labour Court instead of deciding this preliminary point, has ordered that the said point will be decided alongwith other issues arising in the case upon the conclusion of the case.

The said order of the learned Labour Court is in direct conflict with the decision of their lordships of the Supreme Court in the case reported as Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner v. Mannu Khan and others (1973 SCMR 62). In that case, relying upon the observations of Lord Denman, C.J. Rex v. Boltan ((1841) I Q B 66) 'in the Supreme Court has held that a tribunal's jurisdiction is determinable at the commencement and not at the conclusion of the proceedings., The learned Labour Court, accordingly, ought not to have postponed determination of the issue of, jurisdiction till the conclusion of the case, as it has done, but should have decided the issue as a preliminary issue and only if it holds that it has jurisdiction in the matter should it further proceed with the determination of the grievance of the respondent. I would, accordingly, set aside the order of the learned Labour Court, dated 17-10-1982, with the direction to decide the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary issue before considering other points involved in the grievance petition,

2. The two suo motu revisions stand disposed of.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search