' Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was also received injuries in the instant case and his injuries were suppressed by the prosecution, that he was also medically examined through police on 18-9-2002, that one injury is on the head and other is chip fracture of one of the fingers of the petitioner that now there is a cross-version and the complainant party has also been challaned and they are on bail and petitioner should also be met with the same treatment.
2. On the other hand, learned' counsel for the complainant submits that counter-version is afterthought; that injuries on the person of the present petitioner are self-inflicted and the offence falls within the ambit of section 497(1), Cr.P.C., however, learned State counsel submits that complainant party has also been challaned and according to him it is a case of two versions falling under subsection (2) of section 497, Cr . P. C .
3.I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner was also injured, his medico-legal report has been placed on record, one injury is one the head while the other is chip fracture of one of the fingers. Both the parties have suppressed the injuries of each other, police has_ also challaned the complainant party and now it has become a case of two versions, therefore, this petition is accepted. Petitioner is allowed bail subject to furnishing bail bonds to the tune of Rs.50,000 (Fifty thousand) with two sureties in the like amounot to the satisfaction of trial Court. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.