Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2004 YLR 2024

MUHAMMAD HASSAN and anothers vs THE STATE

Citation2004 YLR 2024
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Bail Application No.S-118 of 2004
Date2004-03-08
Judge(s)Wahid Bux Brohi
ResultBail granted

ORDER

1. ' Applicants are facing trial for an offence punishable under sections 324, 353/34, P.P.C.

2. ' It is the case of prosecution that on 20-1-2003 complainant S . I. P. Abdullah Khan, S.H.O., Police Station K.N. Shah received a message that three persons riding a motorcycle were signalled to stop by the police belonging to Thariri Mohabbat but they succeeded in running away, therefore, blockade may be held. The S.H.O. Took his subordinate staff and held Nakabandi. The motorcycle appeared at 11-30 a.m. And on seeing police party they took a turn to go back but they lost balance and fell down. One of them identified to be Manzoor managed to escape but the other two after an encounter of 25 minutes were captured and a K.K. And pistol were secured from the applicants.

3. ' I have heard Mr. Abdul Rasool Abbasi, Advocate for the applicants and Mr. Gul Hassan Solangi, learned counsel for the State. The latter has opposed the bail on the ground that the applicants had initially resisted their arrest and fired at police party.

4. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the applicant that in the main case registered as Crime No.16 of 2003 for an offence under section 17(3), Offences Against Property (Enforcement of.

5. Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, the applicants have already been granted bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mehar. As regards the recovery of K.K. And pistol. Learned State Counsel is not aware if any case under section 13(d), Arms Ordinance has been registered or not. As far the instant case is concerned, the allegations are only of ineffective firing although it is said that exchange of fires continued for about 25 minutes. The applicants have remained in jail for a period of more than one year and one month. In the circumstances, they appear to be entitled to concession of bail.

6. ' In result of the above, the application is allowed. The applicants be released on bail subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.100,000 each and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch