Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2004 YLR 70

MUHAMMAD AYYUB alias MANNA vs THE STATE

Citation2004 YLR 70
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No,1254-B 2003
Date2003-06-12
Judge(s)Ch. Iftikhar Hussain, M. A. Shahid Siddiqui
ResultBail granted

ORDER

' M.A. SHAHID SIDDIQUI, J.---Muhammad Ayyub alias Manna petitioner is involved in a case registered at Police Station Fazilpur, vide F.I.R. No,181 of 2002, dated 29-5-2002 under Articles 3 and 4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979 read with section 9(c) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997.

2. Allegedly, Jan Muhammad, S.-I. Of Police Station City, Fazilpur obtained a search warrant from the Ilaqa Magistrate and raided the house of the accused on 29-5-2002 at 6-15 a.m. He recovered Charas weighing 1055 grams and one plastic cane containing 10 litre indigenous liquor. 30 grams of Charas was separated and made into a sealed parcel for chemical analysis. Since then, the petitioner is in judicial lock-up.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that despite the lapse of more than a year, the prosecution has not submitted the challan and uptil now there is nothing on the record to show that the substance which was allegedly recovered from the possession of the petitioner was Charis.

4. In view of the inordinate delay in the submission of the challan, we summon the District Attorney to explain as to why the prosecution has failed to submit the challan in the competent Court of law.

The learned District Attorney submitted that an incomplete report under section 173, Cr.P.C. Was submitted in the Court of Ilaqa Magistrate, which was never placed before the learned Presiding Officer and the Ahlmad of the said Court returned it back to the office of District Attorney.

5. A perusal of record shows that the Chemical Examiner in its report dated 8-6-2002 had informed the police that the result of the analysis of the sample was inconclusive; as such, a second sample was required for analysis. Admittedly, the second sample has not so far been sent to the office of the Chemical Examiner.

6. In view of the above, there is nothing on the record to show that the substance, allegedly recovered from the petitioner, was Charas. The petitioner cannot be detained for indefinite period.

The delay in the submission of the challan has also not been properly explained. In these circumstances, we feel constrained to order the release of the petitioner on bail subject to furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rupees One Lac with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Rajanpur.

7. The learned Sessions Judge, Rajanpur, is directed to depute an officer to hold an inquiry into the circumstances, which led to the delay in the submission of the challan and commencement of trial. In case, the police officials are found at fault, he shall refer the matter to the District Police Officer, Rajanpur, or the Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Dera Ghazi Khan Range, Dera Ghazi Khan, as the case may be, for action under the Disciplinary and Efficiency Rules, and in case any employee of the Civil Court is found at fault, the learned Sessions Judge would himself initiate action against him in accordance with law under intimation to this Court within two months from the date of the receipt of this order.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch