' Ahmad Yar, father of the present respondent had filed a suit against the petitioners for declaration that he is owner and in possession of the suit-land and mutation of Tamleek in respect of said land purporting to have been executed by him in favour of Allah Rakha, predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners, is against facts and is based on fraud.
2. Alongwith the suit, a stay application was also moved for grant of interim injunction for restraining the petitioners from interfering with his peaceful possession till the final disposal of the suit.
3. The said application was opposed by the petitioners and was ultimately accepted by the trial Court on 10-7-2002.
4. Petitioner's appeal against that order was dismissed by the Additional District Judge, Mailsi on 3- 4-2003.
5. In this civil revision, the aforesaid concurrent orders of the two Courts below are assailed by the petitioners as against law and facts.
6. Interference in revision with decisions regarding matters which are within the discretion of subordinate Court is not warranted unless order is contrary to the principles governing the exercise of such discretion or the Court had acted perversely or arbitrarily. Improper exercise of discretion may be corrected in appeal but not in revision.
7. Provisional jurisdiction is directed against the irregular exercise, non-exercise or illegal assumption of jurisdiction and not against the conclusions of law or fact not involving question of jurisdiction, however, erroneous they may be.
8. A perusal of impugned orders shows that they are reasonable, are supported by plausible reasoning and do not suffer from any jurisdictional infirmity.
9. Civil revision is dismissed in liming.