' MUNIR A. SHEIKH, J.--- The suit filed by the petitioner for recovery of articles of dowry or in lieu the price thereof, was dismissed by the learned Judge Family Court, Sargodha through judgment, dated 1-3-2002. In appeal filed by her, however, the First Appellate Court set aside the judgment and decree of the trial Court and decreed the suit on the basis of list of articles appended with the plaint through judgment, dated 1-1-2003. In Constitutional petition filed by the respondent, the learned Judge of the High Court came to the conclusion that the judgment and decree of the First Appellate Court was based on no evidence, therefore, it was declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect through the impugned judgment, dated 7-5-2003 against which leave is sought.
2. We have gone through the evidence produced by the petitioner which consists of only of her own statement. She did not state that the list of articles appended with the plaint as Exh.P.A. Was prepared at the time of Rukhsati: She stated that she did not know as to what articles had been mentioned in this list. No evidence to corroborate her statement that she was given articles of dowry was produced.
3. The learned Judge of the High Court was legally correct in holding that the judgment of the First Appellate Court was based on no evidence, therefore, this petition has no merits which is accordingly dismissed and .