ORDER IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN CHAUDHRY, C.J.-- Writ Petitions Nos. 21603/2002, 280/2003, 447/2003 and Cr. Origl. No. 6-W/2003 in W.P. No. 20015/2002 shall be disposed of by this order.
2. Under consideration petitions were filed with the grievance that officers of Pakistan Army, who are members of Army Monitoring Teams were forcing the petitioners to appear before them in order to settle monetary dispute with third parties. The petitioners were summoned through police functionaries 6f various Police Stations and then were forced to come to terms with the applicants, who submitted applications on various grounds before the Army Monitoring Teams or the Army officers, who have been impleaded as respondents in the petitions, as well.
3. Notices of the petitioners were given to Federation of Pakistan and the Province of Punjab.
Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned law officers were heard in the matter.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners referred to 2001 M LD 1871 and order dated 23.2.2001 passed in writ petition No. 1081/2001 by this Court and numerous other precedents to urge that Army officials had no authority to summon the civilians on private persons to appear before them in connection with any matter, whatsoever, It was argued that the respondents Army officials were summoning the petitioners to settle civil disputes for which they had no authority, It was also argued that Army Monitoring Teams or Complaint Cells were not constituted by any law or instrument and the officials did not have any power under any law of the land under which they could summon the petitioners or force them to come to terms with third parties and everything done by them as illegal, unlawful and without jurisdiction, It was also argued that the Army officials were liable to be prosecuted on civil and criminal side for the coercion and misuse of authority, particularly, when the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan stood revived and the army authorities were not vested with any administrative power to deal with civil matters.
Learned Law Officers, 0n the other hand, submitted that Army Monitoring Teams were established in order to oversee working of the Departments and t they also admitted that members of the Army Monitoring Teams received applications from citizens and also settled certain disputes.
However, when called upon-to refer to any order passed by the competent authority, namely, the Chief Executive of the country, whereby these Teams were constituted or given any power, the law officers were unable to produce any law, order or instrument by virtue of which the Army Monitoring Teams were established or were conferred any particular powers or were assigned any duty. The Army Monitoring Teams, it. Appears, were assigned certain administrative functions by the Army authorities but they were not empowered to deal with any complaint made by a private person to settle any dispute, criminal or civil or to pass any order on an application received from private persons. The members of the Army Monitoring Teams or Complaint Cells were not vested with any power to summon any civilian through police functionaries, who surprisingly were assigned to serve with them by the civil administration. The police functionaries, who appeared in Court, admitted that they had been summoning people to Police Stations in order to produce them before the respondents Army officials. This action on the part of the police functionaries was also unwarranted and was unlawful.
The entire exercise taken by Army Monitoring Teams or Complaint Cells, whereby they had been resolving monetary disputes or disputes of civil nature between different parties, was illegal and unlawful for which they can be prosecuted on civil or criminal side by aggrieved persons, who had suffered on account of illegal orders or unlawful actions taken by the respondents Army officials or other members of the Army Teams. Learned law officers of the Federation and the Province of Punjab admitted that these Teems/Cells stood abolished after revival of the Constitution. The police functionaries who were assigned to these Teams/Cells were also withdrawn by the Police Department and at present the Army Monitoring Teams are neither in existence nor are performing any functions.
4. Therefore, the present petitions are disposed of. The aggrieved persons, however, shall be at liberty to have recourse to . Any civil or criminal remedy available to them in order to get undone the wrong done to them by the respondents.