Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2004 P C R L J 923

MAZHAR IQBAL and others vs THE STATE

Citation2004 P C R L J 923
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No,2633/B of 2003
Date2003-05-16
Judge(s)Khawaja Muhammad Sharif
ResultPre-arrest bail confirmed.

ORDER

' Learned counsel for the petitioners in support of this petition submits that even according to the impugned judgment the complainant has forgiven the accused, although the offences are not compoundable, this case becomes a case of further inquiry. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon 1995 PCr.LJ 1107 and 1998 SCM R 466.

2. Learned State Counsel conceded the proposition stated by the petitioners' counsel.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the order, dated 23- 4-2003 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kasur in which it has been mentioned that a compromise has been effected between the complainant and the accused and according to the learned Judge the offence was a heinous one so he did not confirm the bail in this regard.

4. As the complainant has forgiven the accused/petitioners and he has no. Objection if the pre- arrest bail already granted to the petitioners is confirmed. In this view of the matter the pre-arrest bail already granted to the petitioners is hereby confirmed. Petitioners are directed to file fresh bail bonds in the sum of Rs,10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court within a week.

Pre-arrest . revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch