Pakistan Case Law← Search
2003 PTD 958

IQBAL HAIDER, COST & MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANT, BAHAWALPUR vs

Citation2003 PTD 958
CourtFederal Tax Ombudsman
Case No.Complaint No, 975 of 2001
Date2001-08-23
Judge(s)Saleem Akhtar
ResultOrder accordingly

DECISION /FINDINGS ' The claimant is a Cost and Management Accountant who was nominated by the C.B.R. For assessm ent work in respect of outsourced special audit cases of Income Tax for assessment year 1997-98. Such nomination was made on 13-2-1998 and 28 cases were entrusted to him. He finalised all the cases and requested for payment of fee and commission through bills for Rs,1,10,000 against fee/remuneration and Rs,63,930 against commission in accordance with the advertisement which appeared in daily "JANG", Lahore on 28-11-1997. After submitting the bills the claimant has been writing letters and reminders and visiting' the office of the Commissioner but to no avail. He has claimed that his bills are paid and matter be settled.

2. In reply the department admitted the nomination and the work performed by the claimant and pleaded that claimant's bills remained under process and pending due to non-availability of necessary funds and the claimant was duly informed. It was further stated that claim. Is pending only due to non-availability of necessary funds for which proposal for allotment has duly been made by CIT, Bahawalpur on 18-11-2000. It is denied that any maladministration has been committed by the department.

3. From the facts it is clear that the claimant's bills have not been paid and admittedly it was due to non-availability of funds. It is very strange that appointments are made services are rendered and yet no steps are taken to make the funds available. It is sheer mismanagement that without having funds or obtaining the funds services of Chartered Accountants and Cost and Management Accountants are obtained and even after services are rendered their remuneration is not paid. This should have been visualized by the department and funds should have been obtained within a reasonable time. The most disappointing aspect is that during 18-6-1999 to 30-3-2000 the claimant had written nine letters on different dates but none was replied. The first reply came as late as on 30-6-2000. Again from 5-8-2000 up to 28-3-2000 seven reminders and letters were issued and reply was made on 14-4-2000. No explanation for not replying the letters has been offered. The delay in completely ignoring the letters and not replying it for months together in spite of reminders and personal visits amounts to maladministration on the part of the department. The claim is admitted and a justification sheet was also issued in which is stated that the Administrative Officer Commissioner Income Tax/Wealth Tax Bahawalpur Zone. Bahawalpur has written that the office has to pay a sum' of Rs,1,74,000 to the claimant which was sent to the Second Secretary (Exp. Bud), C.B.R. On 18-11-2000 but till today there does not B seem to be any progress. It is recommended that C.B.R. To finalise and pay Rs,1,74,000 to the claimant within one month and report compliance within one week thereafter.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search