' FALAK SHER, J.---We propose to dispose of Civil Petitions for leave to appeals Nos.905 to 913-L of 2002 having commonality of facts and law and stemming out of the same judgment of a learned Judge of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 14-1-2002, granting the respondents F.A.O's setting aside the order of Judge. Social Security Court dated 1-11-2001, turning down the respondents complaint, grudging against imposition of increased demand under section 23(1) of the Punjab Employees Social Security Ordinance, 1965 in the nature of penalty for failure to pay contribution on the payments made under the Punjab Employees Special Allowance (Payment) Act, 1988 vires whereof was upheld in the case of "Shamas Textile Mills Ltd. And others v. The Province of Punjab and 2 others (1999 SCM R 1477) being discriminatory", having exempted from penalty those respondents who had availed of judicial remedy present petitions have been re-coursed.
2. Which we are afraid are misconceived since the banked upon criteria hardly constitute reasonable classification permissible tinder Article 25 of the 1973 Constitution and are accordingly dismissed declining leave.