1. ' Applicant facing trial in Crime No,96 of 2003 under section 13-D, Arms Ordinance stated by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is stated to have been apprehended from thickly-populated area. No compliance with the requirement of section 103, Cr.P.C. Was made. All the witnesses are police officials. There is no justification to show that why the independent witnesses were not associated while effecting recovery of the weapon and other incriminating articles. The offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. It is apparently for such reason that the bail was not opposed by the learned Additional A.-G.
2. Accordingly, the applicant is extended benefit of bail on furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs, One hundred thousand and P.R. Bond in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.