1. MUHAMMAD SAIR ALI, J.- Learned counsel for the respondent has objected to the maintainability of this appeal under Section 136 of the Income Tax Ordinance and has relied upon the judgment of this Court reported as M/s. Hong Kong Chinese Restaurant, Main Boulevard Gul berg, Lahore v.
2. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6, Lahore and another (2002 PTD 1878).
2. In that judgment this Court inter alia found that no appeal laid under the provisions of Section 136 of the late Income Tax Ordinance against an order of the Tribunal recorded on a miscellaneous application, It was only an order of the Tribunal recorded under Section 135 of the late Income Tax Ordinance which was amenable to the appellant jurisdiction of this Court.
3. 3 Since admittedly the impugned order was recorded on a miscellaneous application declining rectification of earlier order of the Tribunal, this further appeal is not competent.
4. 4 Dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.