1. ' MAULVI ANWARUL HAQ, J.---This application seeks review of judgment dated 12-4-2001 in R.F.A.
2. No,301 of 1999. Primarily the ground forthcoming for review is that, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, condition could not have been imposed while granting leave to defend the suit.
3. This contention has been opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent who objects the very maintainability of this review.
2. After making some submissions the learned counsel agrees that instead of reviewing the impugned judgment, let it be amended to this extent that the sum of Rs,7,00,000 to be deposited by the petitioner should be reduced and fixed at Rs,4,00,000. The prayer made by the learned counsel for the parties is found to be proper and is allowed. The review application is accordingly disposed of with the observation that in the judgment dated 12-4-2001 passed in R.F.A. No,301 of 1999 the figure Rs,7,00,000 occurring at page 3 of the judgment shall be read as Rs,4,00,000 (Rupees four lacs). Now the petitioner shall make this deposit on or before 18th of February, 2003.
4. Needless to state that in case the amount is not deposited with the learned trial Court on or before the said date, the leave granted to the petitioner in the said judgment shall stand withdrawn. The copy of this order be immediately remitted to the learned Banking/trial Court who shall take all steps to conclude the proceedings and to decide the matter before 30th of September, 2003. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.