1. This case pertains to Crime No,71 of 2000, Police Station Faridabad District Dadu. Apparently the incident occurred on 22-11-2000. The present applicant has been attributed to role where he fired at two persons. However, the main role in the F.I.R has been attributed to Mashooque Ali. The bail application was moved but, it was dismissed by the trial Court thereafter the bail application was filed before the High Court and by order dated 2-11-2001 directions were given to the trial Court to record evidence of material witnesses within three months. Then on the failure of the trial Court to record evidence as per direction' of the High Court another bail application was moved before the trial Court which was dismissed by the trial Court by order dated 6-5-2003 only on the ground that the accused persons had been charged and the process for P.W was being issued. According to the counsel for the applicant the delay is indicated by the order passed on 6-5-2003. He has further produced copies of case diary, According to which the case has not proceeded on several grounds. There are several case-laws of the Hon'ble Supreme Court which clearly stated that in case if a direction is given and compliance is not made then bail is normally granted unless there are other circumstances. From the date of the order passed by this Court in 2001 till the date when by a short order bail was granted on 30th of May, 2003. Two years had passed and still no evidence was recorded. Relying on the principles laid down in the case of Behram v. The State (2003 PCr.LJ 73), bail was granted. The above are the reasons behind which by a short order bail was granted.