The petitioner seeks post arrest bail in case FIR No, 323, dated 25.8.2003, registered at Police Station, Harappa, District Sahiwal, under Sections 337-A(i), (iii), 337-H (v), 337-H (ii), 148 and 149 PPC.
2. A blow with iron rod on the head of Naik Muhammad is attributed to the petitioner. According to the FIR, both the parties were armed and the accused party was the aggressor.
3. Inter-alia, it is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that according to the FIR, complainant party was also, armed; that in fact said party was the aggressor; it is a case of two versions and that there is delay of about two days in loading the FIR.
4. Bail application is opposed by the learned State counsel.
5. Arguments heard. Record perused.
6. Only one injury with iron rod on the head of Naik Muhammad is attributed to the petitioner, which was admittedly not repeated; from a perusal of police record, it appears to be a case of two versions. It would be established at the trial as to who was the aggressor and whether it is a case of vicarious liability. In view thereof, case of the petitioner calls for further inquiry into his guilt. He is accordingly admitted to bail subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (rupees one lac only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.