' It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that only ineffective firing is attributed to the present petitioner, that he is behind the bars for the last 11 months, no more required by the police for further investigation and that his case is of further inquiry falling under subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C.
2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner is named in the F.I.R., specific role is attributed to him and the offence alleged against him falls within the ambit of section 497(1), Cr.P.C.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Occurrence in this case had taken place on 28-6- 2002. Petitioner remained absconder for one year and four months. He has not only caused ineffective firing but has also given butt blow alongwith his co-accused to the complainant who is an injured and star witness of the prosecution. There are two deceased persons in this case.
Offence falls within the ambit of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. No ground for bail is made out, therefore, this petition is dismissed.