' The petitioners who are charged in a case registered against them under sections 324/34, P.P.C., vide F.I.R. No,685 dated 6-8-2002, Police Station, Hangu, seek their release on bail mainly on the ground that for two injuries as many as three persons have been charged without specifying as to whose fire turned effective.
2. The learned counsel for the State assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant opposes the grant of bail on the ground that the petitioners being directly charged are not entitled to be released on bail especially when they became fugitive from law after the commission of the crime.
3. I have gone through the record and carefully considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties.
4. The record reveals that there are two injuries on the person of the complainant for which as many as three persons have been charged. Whether it could be the doing of one person or more than one; whose tire turned effective, if at all.They were present and whether they can be saddled with the intention to kill the complainant when the injuries are not on the vital part of the body, are the questions which essentially require further inquiry particularly when the possibility, at the moment, of false implication in view the tendency of the people to throw wide the net of implication to rope in even those who have no hand in the commission of the crime, cannot be ruled out.
5. For the reasons discussed above, this petition is allowed and the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, if they furnish bail bonds in the sum of Rs,3,00,000 (Rs, Three lacs) each in the'like amount to the satisfaction of the Illaqa/Judicial Magistrate who is to ensure that me sureties are local, reliable and men of means.