Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLD 2003 Karachi 60

MUHAMMAD YAKOOB and 8 others vs THE STATE

CitationPLD 2003 Karachi 60
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Bail Application No,868 of 2002
Date2002-08-19
Judge(s)Ata-ur-Rehman
ResultBail granted

ORDER

This application has been moved by nine persons namely Muhammad Yaqoob son of Bahadur Marri, Sher Muhammad son of Muhammad Saleh Marri, Shero Sher Muhammad son of Muhammad Bachal Marri, Motio son of Rabdino Marri, Lal Bux son of Wallo @ Jalal Marri, Bilawal son of Jarro Marri, Juman son of Haroon Marri, Bhooro son of Moryo Marri and Ghulam Nabi son of Dillo Marri, who are involved in Crime No,4/2002 under sections 302, 301, 324, 337-A(ii) F(ii) H(ii), 337A(i) F(i), 353, 147, 148, 149, 427, 447, P.P.C. Read with section 17(3), E.H.O. Of Police Station Naing Sharif.

2. The facts of the case narrated in the F.I.R. It appears from the contents of the F.I.R. That on the day of incident about 40/42 persons entered into the premises of the company and caused damage to the property. During this someone from the crowd snatched the gun from the police official Khair Muhammad Birehmani and started firing, as a result of which one Fazil who was present there died on the spot. The names of applicants Nos.1, 6, 7 8 and 9 are not disclosed in the F.I.R. However, the names of applicants No,2, 3, 4 and 5 appear therein. In respect of murder of Fazil another F.I.R.

Bearing No,5 of 2002 of the same Police Station was also recorded. In this F.I.R. Three persons were named and all of them were granted bail before arrest in Criminal Bail Applications Nos.226 of 2002 and 867 of 2002 (Karachi).

3. A perusal of the record shows that there is no specific allegation against the present applicants in all and also four applicants named in the F.I.R. At the most, it appears that they were participants of crowd who entered into the premises of the company as narrated in the F.I.R. The Court alongwith Mr. Habibur Rasheed, learned State Counsel went through the entire police file but it was not found that as to who was that person who snatched the gun from the police official and fired which caused death of the Fazil. At least at this stage, it cannot be said that any of nine persons who are the applicants before this Court attributed to have caused fire-arm injury to deceased Fazil. As to the violence by these persons against the police officers, it was found that none of the police officer was medically examined and no report is available on record to that effect. It was also examined as to whether any incriminating article or crime weapon has been recovered from the applicants but the answer was in negative. The applicants are in custody since 30-4-2002 and according to the counsel for the applicants d has been submitted but the charge has not been framed so far.

4. Under the circumstances, a case of further inquiry has been made out in respect of all the applicants and they are entitled to the bail.

5. In view of the above, all the applicants are allowed bail subject to their furnishing surety in the sum of Rs,100,000 each (Rupees One lac each) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch