Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2003 C.L.R. 351

Mst. Aziz Begum vs Mirza Mushtaq

Citation2003 C.L.R. 351
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Review Petition No. 59-L of 2002 in CMA No. 897-L of 2002
Date2002-07-18
Judge(s)Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday, Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi
ResultApplication Dismissed

ORDER

KHALiL-UR-REHMAN RAM DAY, J.--- An' application addressed by a widow, to the Hon'ble Chief Justice of Pakistan was directed by his lordship to be heard on the judicial side. This is how this matter is before us.

2. The petitioner who is present in person has been heard. The respondent against whom this application was submitted is also present in person and he has also been heard.

3. From the record, it appears that a dispute relating to 452 square yards of land existed between one Mirza Mushtaq Ahmed and his wife Mst. Jamila on one side and the late husband of the present petitioner namely Allah Wasaya on the other side. A suit filed by the said Mirza Mushtaq Ahmed and his wife was decreed in their favour and against Allah Wasaya through a judgment dated 20.6.1996' passed by a learned Civil Judge at Multan. The appeal filed by the present petitioner was dismissed by the learned District Judge of Multan through a judgment dated 14.4.1999. Civil Revision No. 209 of 1999 filed by the present petitioner party against the above-mentioned judgments of the learned Trial and the Appellate Courts was also dismissed by the High Court through a Judgment dated 16.12.1999. The present petitioner and the other heir of the said Allah Wasaya questioned the said three judgments before this Court through C.P. No. 62-L of 2000 which was dismissed by this Court through a judgment dated 29.3.2002. The petitioner and her other co-heirs did not still feel satisfied and filed a civil review petition bearing No. 59 of 2002 which was also dismissed by this Court.

4. In this view of the matter, this application is un- necessary and redundant and the same is hereby dismissed.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch