' This is an application for cancellation of bad moved by Safdar All petitioner, directed against the order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Lyallpur dated 29-10-1976 by which he had allowed pre- arrest bail to all the three respondents while they were being tried under sections 326, 324 read with section 34, P. P. C., on the strength of F. I. R. No, 188/214, dated 13-10-1976 relating to the Police Station Satiana, District Lyallpur. The application was admitted and notice was issued to the respondents.
2. I have heard the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner, the learned counsel for the respondents as well as the learned counsel for the State. With their assistance I have also perused the F. I. R. And the Impugned order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that an offence under section 326, P. P. C. Is punishable with life imprisonment; therefore it was not proper for the learned Addl. Sessions Judge to grant the respondents pre-arrest bail which is an extraordinary concession not meant for such like offences. He has further pointed out that the complainant as well as two others in this case received a number of injuries at the hand of Muhammad Azam alias Jang Ban respondent while Ashiq Ali and Muhammad Arebad played active role of assisting him in his nefarious design by holding the victim. On the other hand the learned counsel for the respondent has taken me through the order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge and has brought to my notice that this Muhammad Azam alias Jang Baz himsel received seven injuries on his person out of which one was incised wound in the abdomen like the one which was received by the complainant in this case. While going through the F. I. R. I also notice that all these injurie have been suppressed by the complainant party and thus it can be said that an effort has been made to conceal the real facts from the authorities and biased version has been brought forward to the detriment of the respondents. It has also been averred by the learned counsel on behalf of the respondents that a cross-case is also pending against the complainant party in this case under section 326, P. P. C.
3. Keeping all these matters in view the order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge cannot be called as perverse because the learned Court has taken into consideration all these mints and has given a well-considered judgment in these matters. I do not find any reason to set aside the order of the learned Court which to my mind in view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, is fully justified.
The application for cancellation of bail is accordingly rejected.