ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, Through this petition Javaid Akhtar petitioner has sought post-arrest bail in case FIR No. 552 registered at Police Station Kotwali, Jhang on 12.11.2002 for offences under Sections 395/452/337- F(i)/337-F(ii)/148/149, PPC. During the investigation Section 411, PPC was added to the FIR.
2. After hearing the leamed counsel for the parties and going through the record it has been noticed that although the FIR in this case had been lodged with a slight delay yet the reason for that delay had been explained in the FIR itself. The petitioner had been specifically nominated in the FIR as one of the perpetrators of the alleged offences and in the FIR an active participation in the alleged incident had been attributed to the petitioner, It is not disputed that the eye-witnesses mentioned in the FIR, including the injured complainant, have so far stood by their statements made before the police fully implicating the petitioner in the alleged offences, It is pertinent to mention here that the petitioner happens to be a brother-in-law (Ham Zulf) of the complainant and no reason has been brought out on the record as to why the complainant would falsely implicate the petitioner In a case of this nature, In his application for bar (sic) before the Court of Session, Jhang the petitioner had mentioned in paragraph No. 8 thereof that he was present at the spet at the relevant time while he was demanding an amount from the complainant which amount was due from the complainant in connection with a business dispute between the petitioner and the complainant. Unfortunately it is not unlikely or un-usual, for people in this part of the world to take law in their own hands for extracting money from their rival disputants through use of force. During the investigation a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- had been recovered from the petitioner's possession. An offence under Section 395, PPC attracts the prohibitory clause contained in sub-section (I) of Section 497, Cr.P.C. After having become convinced of the guilt of the petitioner the local police has already submitted a challan against him in this case. According to the order dated 23.1.2003 passed by the leamed Additional Sessions Judge, Jhang the petitioner is also involved in a murder case as well as a case for possession of illicit amis, It, thus, appears that the petitioner may have a propensity to get his way through use of force rather than settling his disputes through peaceful and amicable means.
3. For what has been discussed above prima facie reasonable grounds do exist to believe in the petitioner's involvement in the alleged offences and this petition, is, therefore, dismissed.