' The petitioner has sought his post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No,621 registered at Police Station Yazman on 14-12-2002 for an offence under sections 324/337-A(iii)(iv)/34, P.P.C.
2. Briefly, the facts as given in the F.I.R. Are that an altercation took place between Muhammad Ashfaq brother of the complainant and the accused party. Imtiaz Hussain petitioner caught hold of Muhammad Ashfaq, P.W. And started giving him fist and slap blows. In order to defend himself Ashfaq took out scissors from the bag and inflicted injury on the person of Ashfaq Anwar who snatched the scissors from the hand of Ashfaq and gave repeated blows on the person of Ashfaq Anwar. It is stated in the F.I.R. That Imtiaz Hussain, Nasim Bibi and Ashfaq Anwar also received injuries at the hands of the complainant party during the occurrence.
3. The main argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in fact the complainant party was aggressor and the petitioner had reacted in his defence. Conversely, the learned counsel for the complainant as well as the learned counsel for the State have vehemently opposed this application and have argued that firstly, the injured was taken to the place of occurrence by the accused on the pretext of having a dialogue and, thereafter, they launched assault and caused serious injuries to Muhammad Ashfaq, P.W.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the record of the case. It has been noticed that the investigation of the case has been completed and the petitioner has been sent to judicial lock-up. The cross-case was registered on the statement of Imtiaz Hussain petitioner and after investigation challan in that case has also been sent up. It is a clear cut case of two versions which needs further probe and inquiry. Resultantly, I admit the petitioner to bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs,50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.