Pakistan Case Law← Search
K.L.R. 2003 Tax & Corporate Cases 29

Askari Officer Colony, Bedian Road, Lahore Cantt vs The Secretary, Revenue

CitationK.L.R. 2003 Tax & Corporate Cases 29
CourtFederal Tax Ombudsman
Case No.Compl. No. 5-L of 2002,
Date2002-02-28
Judge(s)Saleem Akhtar
ResultAppeal Declined.

DECISION SALEEM AKHTAR (R), J. - The complainant claims to be a student of accountancy and at present he is undergoing training with Mr. Abdul Majeed Chaudhri, FCA of Hameed Chaudhri & Co., Chartered Accountants, Lahore, It is further stated that he is registered with ICAP and a photocopy of identity card issued by the said institute has been furnished.

2 The complainant has further stated that to acquire further education in the field of accountancy, he also got himself registered as candidate to appear in the examination of CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANAYSTS (CFA)-USA. Since the books for this course are not available in Pakistan, he has to import the same from the authorized USA publisher.

3. Some books were accordingly imported but the custom authorities insisted to charge income tax under Section 50(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, whereas the custom-duty was exempt under the provisions of Board's SRO 444(l)/2001, dated 18th June, 2001. In the alternate he was required to produce exemption certificate from the Commissioner of Income Tax concerned.

4. It is alleged that being a student having no independent source of income, he applied from exemption certificate to the Commissioner of Income Tax, Zone-B, Lahore but the CIT declined to accede to this request with the observation that clause (vi)(b) of Board's SRO 593(!)/91, dated 13 6.1991 was not applicable in his case.

5. It is vehemently contended that he was entitled and eligible to get the exemption certificate under the aforesaid SRO on the following grounds:-

(a) The books were imported for personal use and not for commercial purposes.

(b) He was dependent on his father and has no other source of income

(c) There is no likelihood to be taxed as he had to continue his education at least for a period of three years.

6. The complaint has, therefore, requested for issuance of exemption certificate and refund of Rs.1690/- which has been paid for the clearance of the books.

7. The case was fixed for hearing and the above cited representative of the complainant and the respondent appeared. The case has been discussed with them. The respondent has also filed parawise comments vide letter No. 3869, dated 21.1.2002. It has been observed therein: "The complainant applied for issuance of Exemption Certificate under Section 50(5) with reference to clause (vi)(b) of Board's SRO No. ;593(l)/91, dated 30 6.91. The application for issuance of Exemption Certificate was rejected on merit as the complainant is not borne on tax record."

8. The apprehension of the department is that in the absence of any assessment records, relevant inquiries and verification, it is not possible to hold that the application is not a commercial importer. The relevant clause under which exemption has be^n claimed is reproduced hereunder:- - "Persons, other than 'commercial importers, who produce a certificate from the Commissioner of Income Tax concerned,"

9. This issue can be resolved by the Development by making inquiries/investigations as to whether the complainant was importing books for personal study or for commercial purposes.^The verification can also be made as to whether the conditions laid down under clause (vi) of the aforesaid SRO are fulfilled by the applicant or not.

10. It is, therefore, recommended:-

(i) The complainant be asked to file the return of income suo motu in the concerned circle.

(ii) The GIT, Zone-B, Lahore be directed to get the return of income processed on priority and if no tax liability is involved the exemption certificate and the refund of Rs.1690/- be issued within 30 days of the receipt of this order (i.e) The compliance be reported within a -week thereafter.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search