MUNIR A. SHEIKH, J.---Through this petition, the petitioner seeks review of the order dated 21-3- 2000 of this Court by which the main petition was dismissed for non-prosecution and also on the point, of limitation.
2. The judgment impugned in the main petition was passed on 22-11-1999 whereas the said petition was filed on 14-3-2000. In the application made. In the main petition seeking condonation of delay, it has only been Stated that the petitioner was residing in USA and power of attorney was to be sent from there, therefore, the learned counsel took some time to receive the said power of attorney from the petitioner. Thereafter, some time was also required to prepare the case.
3. The law requires that delay of each and every day is to be explained. In this application, no date has been given on which the petitioner was contacted by the learned counsel in USA and as to on which date, he received intimation that the petition was to be filed.
4. No explanation has been given disclosing sufficient cause for condonation of delay of 42 days, therefore, the main on the point of limitation does not suffer from any legal infirmity, therefore, no case has been made out for review.
5. Resultantly, this petition is dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.