Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2002 YLR 3662

SAJJID vs THE STATE

Citation2002 YLR 3662
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No, 1442-B of 2000
Date2000-08-03
Judge(s)Sh. Abdul Razzaq
ResultBail granted

ORDER

Petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No,50 of 2000 dated 6-2-2000 under sections 457/380/411,P . P.O. registered at Police Station Multan Cantt. Multan.

2. Alongwith this petition, Criminal Miscellaneous No,1492-B of 2000 has been tiled by Abdul Hameed. Since both the petitions arise out of the same F.1.R., so these are being disposed of by the single order.

3. Briefly stated the allegation against the present petitioners is that they had committed theft in the shop of complainant and had deprived him of watches, calculators, sunglasses and other articles lying in his shop.

4. The petitioner applied for bail which relief has been declined to them by the Courts below. Hence the instance petitions.

5. Stand of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that 20 watches of Zeenat mate are stated to have been recovered from Sajjad petitioner whereas 94 watches have been recovered from Abdul Hameed petitioner, that Ghulam Jaffar, a co-accused of the present petitioners 'has been released on bail who had led to the recovery of 210 watches, vide order dated 10-5-2000 by the Judicial Magistrate, that case of the petitioners is on better footing than that of Ghulam Jaffar. as such they are entitled to the same relief, relying upon the principle of consistency.

6. Conversely, petitions have been opposed by the learned counsel for the State.

7. It is evident from the contents of F.LR. that none of the present petitioners is a nominated accused in the said F.I.R. They were arrested on 8-5-2000 and are said to have r led to the recovery of watches as mentioned above. Thus at the most case against the petitioners falls under section 411, P.P.C. which does not fall within the prohibitory clause. The co-accused. Ghulam Jaffar who led to the recovery of 210 watches has already been extended the relief of bail. Even on this score the petitioners are entitled to the same treatment as meted out to their co-accused.

8. In the light of facts stated above, the petitions are accepted and they are admitted to bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in B the sum of Rs,50,000 each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch