1. This appeal impugns the order, dated 14-9-2001. By means of the said order the learned. Banking Court has allowed the decree-holder Bank to participate in the auction. We find nothing wrong with the said order. Learned counsel for the appellant was asked to state this objection to the said order.
2. He merely contended that the participation of the Bank will prejudice the appellant. He, however, was not able to justify such assertions nor could be point out a basis for arguing that the appellant will be prejudiced. In this view of the matter, we find that the impugned order is not open to exception. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed.