1. Argues that in fact the petitioner had leased out the factory to Malik Muhammad Saleem etc. On the relevant time. When the alleged theft of Gas occurred, the factory was not with the petitioner. It is therefore, argued that case against the petitioner is open to further enquiry. The confirmation of bail has not been contested by the 'respondent-State. The interim bail already granted to the petitioner is, therefore, confirmed on his furnishing fresh bail bond in the sum of Rs,1,00,000 (Rupees one lac) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.
2. Interim .