MIAN MUHAMMAD AJMAL, J. This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 18.5.2001 whereby Civil Revision No. 420-D of 1984 of the petitioners was dismissed.
2. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that all the Courts erred' in ignoring the agreement between Allah Bakhsh (father) and Zaman, Ghulam Muhammad and Ahmad Khan (his sons) dated 22.5.1991 and the order of the Collector dated 29.5.1935, which could determine the fate of the case.
3. After hearing. The learned counsel for the parties and perusal of the record, we grant leave to appeal, inter a/ia, to consider the following points:-
(i) Whether in view of the order passed by the Collector, Shahpur, District Sargodha dated 29.5.1935, whereby .Muhammad Afzal was held successor of the estate left by Muhammad Zaman, has the learned High Court not erred in ignoring the said order which had attained finality and held the field?
(ii) Whether the Courts below have not fallen into error by ignoring the agreement entered into by Allah Bakhsh and his three sons on 22.5.1911, which was acted upon in the lift time of Allah Bakhsh and his three sons and whether .It was not binding on the successor-in-interest of Zaman, Ghulam Muhammad and Ahmed, sons of Allah Bakhsh?
(i.e) Whether after the death of Allah Bakhsh his son Zaman died issueless while Ghulam Muhammad survived by his son Dost Muhammad and Ahmad survived by Sardara and after their death, the property would not devolve upon Muhammad Afzal under Sections 20 to 23 of the Colonization of Government Lands Act, 1912, as held by the Collector in his order dated 29.5.1935? ,
4. Meanwhile status quo shall be maintained. The Collector of the concerned District shall ensure the implementation of the status quo order.