' Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing the case at some length wants to withdraw this petition on behalf of Muhammad Arshad petitioner No,1, so this petition to the extent of Muhammad Arshad is dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as far as Muhammad Jamil, Muhammad Ilyas and Allah Wasaya petitioners are concerned, no effective role is attributed to them, that no injury either to the deceased or the injured P.W. Is attributed to them and they are behind the bars since 4-11-2001.
3. On the other hand, learned A.A.-G. Submits that as far as, Muhammad Jamil, Muhammad Ilyas and Allah Wasaya petitioners are concerned, he has no objection for the grant of bail to their extent.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the instant case, according to. The F.I.R., it was Muhammad Arshad petitioner No,1, who had caused fatal injury on the person of the deceased and also caused injury on the person of the complainant. As far as, Muhammad Jamil, Muhammad Ilyas and A Allah Wasaya petitioners are concerned, according to the F.I.R., no overt act whatsoever is attributed to them. Even learned A.A-G after going through the police file concedes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, so this bail petition to the extent of Muhammad Jamil, Muhammad Ilyas and Allah Wasaya petitioners is accepted. They are allowed bail subject to furnishing bail bonds to the tune of Rs,50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) each with two sureties each in the like-amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.