' Mr. Taki Ahmed Khan, learned Advocate Supreme Court fcir the petitioner has moved an application for adjournment on the ground mentioned in paragraph No,2 thereof, which reads thus: "2. That it happened I have a personal engagement at Lahore and unable to attend this Hon'ble Court on the abovementioned date. I regret any inconvenience to this august Court."
2. We are afraid, personal engagements of a counsel cannot be given preference to his professional duties towards the Court. Resultantly, the application for adjournment is declined.
3. We have, however, gone through the judgment under review as well as the petition for review with the assistance of Mr. N.A. Butt, learned Advocate Supreme Court for respondent No,1 and find no ground for review. Dismissed.