' MUNIR A. SHEIKH, J.---The petitioner was not found fit for placement of his name in List B1 on the ground that his service record was not good and he had 18 punishments in his credit.
2. The order of the departmental authority was challenged before the Service Tribunal by the petitioner by filing appeal which has been dismissed through the impugned judgment dated 30- 10-2000 against which leave is sought.
3. It has been rightly held by the Service Tribunal that the question of fitness or otherwise of a person for bringing him in List B1 had been decided by the departmental authority on the basis of service record of the petitioner, therefore, there was no justification for interference.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not raised any substantial question of law of public importance as envisaged by Article 212 of the Constitution. It is a case in which the service record of the petitioner had been examined and made the basis for passing the order by the departmental authority.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to pursued us that the considerations wieghed with the departmenal authority were not legally justified. The service record provides material for determining fitness or otherwise of a civil servant which has been duly considered. It was not argued that the service record of the petitioner was misread by the departmental 'authority.
6. For the foregoing reasons, this petition being meritless is hereby dismissed and .