1. ' This is application filed on behalf of the respondents seeking action against (i) the Director Administration, and (ii) The Chief Veterinary Officer of the applicant No,1 for violation of order dated 17-1-1993 passed by this Court. The dispute in the case has arisen out of an application for injunction filed in suit before the learned Vth Civil Judge, Karachi South for declaration to the effect that the respondents-plaintiffs were entitled to collect blood etc. Of animal slaughtered by them in the Slaughter House and to procure appropriate or to dispose of the same and that the applicants-defendants had no legal authority to appropriate the blood etc. The application for interim injunction filed by the respondents-plaintiffs was granted by the learned Civil Judge through his order dated 24-8-1992, except with regard to the waste blood. The appeal preferred by the applicants-defendants was also dismissed by judgment dated 29-10-1992 in the following terms:-- "In the circumstances, in view of the dictum of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, the owners of slaughtered animals cannot be restrained to collect the blood from the slaughtered houses but before the same could become waste blood as it would be duty of the Corporation to remove the refuse that also included waste blood so also the appellants/defendants cannot be permitted to restrain the owners of animals slaughtered in the slaughter houses from removing the blood of their animals before the same became the waste blood. Accordingly the appeal is disposed of with modification in the impugned order that the appellants/defendants are restrained from removing the blood of slaughtered animals or their authorised agent under the law and that the appellants/defendants are also restrained from preventing the owners or their legally authorised agent of slaughtered animals from collecting and removing the blood of their slaughtered animals, except the waste blood till the final disposal of suit. However, the above observations made are tentative in nature would not effect the merits of suit while disposing of the same by the trial Court.
2. The appeal is disposed of in terms of above observations."
3. ' The present revision has been filed by the applicants-defendants against the said judgment dated 29-10-1992. An application for interim injunction was filed by the appellants before this Court which came to be dismissed by order dated 17-1-1993 with the observation that the operation of the impugned order dated 29-10-1992, suspended earlier, stands vacated. In the reasons which were separately recorded on 26-1-1993, the learned Judge referred to judgment of the Supreme Court, reported in 1992 SCM R 857 and was pleased to record as follows:-- "The applicants have thus failed to make out a prima facie case for prohibitory injunction. Their further prayer that they may be allowed to collect waste blood from the Slaughter House Landhi/New Karachi is in the nature of mandatory injunction and if it is allowed it would amount to disposal of the Revision. Hence this also cannot be granted."
4. ' The present application has now been filed alleging violation of the order dated 17-1-1993. The application has been resisted on behalf of the applicants. The learned counsel for the respondents, in support of this application submits that the Chief Veterinary Officer of the applicant has refused to allow the respondents to collect the blood etc. Before it becomes waste. Such action is alleged to be violative of the order dated 17-1-1993. With regard to the other person named in this application namely the Director Administration, K.M.C., no specific action has been ascribed to him in the application to allege violation of the order dated 17-1-1993. In reply, the learned counsel for the applicants, submits that the injunction was originally granted by the Vth Senior Civil Judge, Karachi (South) and such order was maintained by the learned District Judge Karachi (South). The order dated 17-1-1993 cannot be termed as an independent order granting injunction in respect of blood etc., claimed by the respondents, and therefore, the allegation of violation of the order dated 17-1-1993 passed by this Court is unfounded. Indeed, with regard to the observation contained in the penultimate paragraph of the reason dated 26-1-1993, as to the waste blood, the learned counsel for the applicants concedes that no appeal or application for review has been filed.
5. However, the grievance made in this application by the respondents does not pertain to waste blood. On behalf of the applicants it is further urged that the respondents have filed an application complaining of violation of injunction before the learned Civil Judge and such application has been dismissed by order dated 30-5-1993 apparently for lack of the particulars about steps and acts as may be termed to be violate of order of injunction.
6. ' I have considered the respective contentions raised by both the learned counsel. The learned counsel for the applicants is right in pointing out that the order dated 17-1-1993 cannot be treated as an order granting injunction, violation whereof can be agitated by the respondents. The original order of injunction was admittedly passed by the Vth Senior Civil Judge, Karachi (South) and action for violation of injunction can be sought through application made before such Court alone. The proceedings for violation of injunction are absolutely different from proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act, 1976. The respondents, therefore, can apply for proceeding under Order 39, rule 2(3), C.P.C. Before the learned Senior Civil Judge who had granted interim injunction through his order dated 24-8-1992, if otherwise maintainable. Surely the violation of the order of interim injunction passed by the Senior Civil Judge could not be complained of nor can proceedings be initiated before this Court in exercise of power under Order, 39, rule 2(3), C.P.C.
7. ' In the circumstances, this application is dismissed as not maintainable with no order as to costs.