Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2002 SCMR 362

GULZAR and another vs THE STATE

Citation2002 SCMR 362
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Petition No,29-L of 2001 Criminal Appeal No,887 of 1995 and
Judge(s)Rashid Aziz Khan, Tanvir Ahmed Khan
ResultLeave refused

1. ' RASHID AZIZ KHAN, J.---Facts in brief leading to the filing of this petition for leave to appeal are that Gulzar son of Noor Muhammad, Maqsood son of Sultan and Sooba son of Sultan were reported against with Police Station Langrana, District Jhang for the murder of Noor Muhammad. Case was got registered by Zulfiqar, father of the deceased. Learned trial Court vide its judgment, dated 13-11- 1995 found Gulzar guilty under section 302/34, P.P.C. And sentenced him to death. Remaining accused namely Maqsood and Sooba were sentenced to imprisonment for life. Convicts appealed.

2. During pendency of the appeal, Maqsood died, therefore, appeal to his extent abated. A learned Division Bench of Lahore High Court, vide its judgment, dated 29-11-2000 dismissed the appeal and confirmed the sentences of the accused. Petitioners have now challenged the said order of Lahore High Court.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and with his assistance perused the file.

3. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners was that it was night time occurrence, therefore, the question of identity is doubtful and in such circumstances, benefit of doubt should have been extended to the petitioners. After examining the record, we have noticed that Zulfiqar complainant appeared on oath and deposed that he knew the petitioners previously as they were the residents of the adjoining village. He was put to the test of lengthy cross- examination about his enmity or background of hostility against the petitioners but nothing could be brought on the record which could persuade the trial Court to hold that complainant was interested, inimical or had any background of hostility. The statement of Zulfiqar complainant is amply corroborated by the statement of tracker who had tracked the footprints of the petitioners.

4. There is also a statement of Muhammad Ishaque P.W.6, who had seen the petitioners at the scene of occurrence.

5. 'After having scanned the entire file, we are of the view that cogent reasons have been given by the learned Division Bench of Lahore High Court for dismissing the appeal of the petitioners. We find no merit in this petition, which fails and is dismissed. Leave to appeal is refused.

Cited by 2 cases

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch