1. DER ' The applicant is charged with an offence under section 17(1) the Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance. 1979 and is facing trial before the Court of learned Sessions Judge Larkana alongwith two others Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the name of the applicant does not appear in the F.I.R. He has been falsely implicated due to enmity and the offence is not punishable for more than seven years.
2. ' Mr. G.A. Shahani, Addl. A.-G. Appearing for the State has conceded to the bail plea of the applicant by stating that the only evidence against the applicant is his identification after more than three weeks of the incident.
3. ' While the offence prescribed minimum punishment of R.I. For three years, it does not specify any maximum sentence for imprisonment. Since no maximum punishment is prescribed for the alleged offence, the case against the applicant cannot be stretched in favour of the prosecution.
4. ' Keeping in view the law laid down in the case of Tariq Bashir v. The State reported as PLD 1995 SC 34, bail is granted to the applicant subject to his furnishing a solvent surety in the sum of Rs,1,00,000 (Rupees one lac) and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.