Pakistan Case Law← Search
2002 PTD 1681

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs KOTHARI SUGARS AND CHEMICALS LTD.

Citation2002 PTD 1681
CourtMadras High Court
Case No.Tax Cases Nos. 156 of 158
Date1997-07-29
Judge(s)K. P. Sivasubramaniam, K. A. Thanikkachalam
ResultReference. Answered

1. K. A . THANIKKACHALAM , J.---At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal referred the following common question for the opinion of this Court for the assessment years 1978-79 to 1980-81, under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the amount set apart for credit to the 'molasses storage fund account' is an allowable deduction in the computation of income?"

2. A similar case came up for consideration before this Court in CIT v. Salem Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. (1998) 229 ITR 285, wherein this Court held that the amount set apart for "molasses storage fund" is an allowable deduction. Inasmuch as the order passed by the Tribunal is in accordance with the above said decision of this Court, we answer the question referred to us in the affirmative and against the Department. No costs. d.

For educational and research use only β€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerΒ·PrivacyΒ·TermsΒ·Search