' JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, J.---This appeal assails the judgment and decree, dated 17-3-1998 passed by the learned Judge Banking Court No, II, Faisalabad and the order, dated 1-3-1999 passed by the said Court.
2. The impugned judgment and decree, which were passed ex parte, have been assailed by the appellant on the ground that the plaintiff-Bank had provided incorrect address of the appellant in the plaint. According to him, the appellant was residing at House No,661, All Housing Colony, Faisalabad, but the address given in the plaint was 221/6-C, Altaf Gunj, Faisalabad. This submission on behalf of the appellant, however, has no merit because the appellant had himself entered into an agreement with the respondent-Bank for the purpose of satisfying the decree passed against him. In the said agreement the appellant has himself given his address as 221/6-C, Altaf Gunj, Faisalabad, which was the address given in the plaint. The execution of the aforesaid agreement is not denied by the appellant. In the circumstances, the learned Banking Court was entirely justified in passing the order, dated 1-3-1999 and thereby dismissing the application moved by the appellant/defendant for setting aside of the ex parte decree.
3. We also note that the auction has been duly confirmed in favour of the auction-purchaser vide order, dated 2-3-1999 passed by the learned Banking Court. It appears from the contents of the order, dated 1-3-1999 that an objection petition was filed on behalf of the appellant to assail the auction of the property in dispute, but the same was not pressed by counsel representing the appellant in these circumstances, a legal right in the auctioned property has become duly vested in the auction purchaser. The appellant cannot at this late stage, be allowed to assail the auction.
4. In view of the above circumstances, we find no merit in IC this appeal which is, therefore, dismissed.