' A decree for recovery of money was passed in favour of the respondent-Bank against respondent No,2 and was sought to be executed by way of sale of the property of the judgment-debtor mortgaged with the respondent-Bank against deposit of title-deed. The appellant filed an application objecting to the said sale on the ground that in execution of the said decree it is his property that is being sought to be sold. The objection was based on a sale-deed whereby he has purchased 10 Marlas of land from Khasra No,1080/168 in Begumpura, Lahore, urban area. The stand taken by the respondent-Bank before the learned Executing Court was that the property stands mortgaged with them and they also produced the original documents for the inspection of the said learned Executing Court. It was further undertaken that only the property of the said judgment-debtor would be sold. This is also the tenor of the order being impugned in this First Appeal from Order.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant when confronted with the said circumstances, states that since ultimately the application was rejected his client apprehends that his rights in property may not be prejudiced. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank on the other hand states at the bar that in the execution of the said decree only the property of the judgment-debtor, so mortgaged with the respondent-Bank, shall be sold.
3. In view of the said clear undertaking on behalf of the respondent-Bank, this F.A.O. Need not to be proceeded any further and is accordingly disposed of.