' The respondent-Company invited applications from Pakistani nationals for the position of Trainee Engineers for training/posting at any of the various company's stations in the Provinces of Sindh and Balochistan, by floating and advertisement in the Daily "Dawn" on 18-7-1993 for which the appellant also applies and he was selected as Trainee Engineer vide letter of appointment dated 28-2-1995. The respondent-Company however, vide the letter dated 10-3-1999 discontinued temporary/training assignment of the appellant against which he preferred departmental appeal which was turned down and thereafter he preferred instant appeal on various grounds as detailed in the memo. Of appeal with the prayer for setting aside the impugned order by holding at to be illegal, void, arbitrary and unlawful and with the request for direction to the respondents to reinstate in service the appellant with back benefits and also to regularize him against the available vacancy from the date of its occurrence.
2. Respondents contested the appeal by filing parawise comments by maintaining that the appellant was offered only training .Assignment without any commitment to provide employment by the Company. It was further maintained that the appellant was never taken by the respondents in accordance with the recruitment procedure rather he was taken as Trainee temporary assignee under pressure from the then Government. The allegations of discrimination were denied.
3. Arguments heard and record perused.
4. As the factual, and law points involved in the present appeal as, well as Appeal No, 1097(R)/99- Salim Mustafa Shaikh v. Federation of Pakistan and others. Decided by a Full Bench of this Tribunal on 29-4-2000, are similar/identical, hence without adverting to a detailed discussion, we accept this appeal by adopting mutatis mutandis the reasons shown in the aforementioned judgment in Appeal No, 1097(R)/99, as the arguments are heard in this appeal also alongwith the said appeal on the same date with the result that the impugned order of discontinuation of temporary/training assignment of the appellant is set aside and the respondent's Company is directed to issue the letter of absorption in career Executive Cadre of the appellant in the respondent-Company as it was issued to Nisar A. Sangi on 17-4-1998.
5. This appeal is allowed in terms as stated above with cost.
6. Copies, of this judgment to be sent to the parties through registered