The only ground on which notice was issued to the respondent-Bank was that the appellant had wanted to make payment of the decretal debt in instalments. We have asked learned counsel to show if any amount at all has been paid to the respondent-Bank after the passing of the impugned decree on 7-3-2002. He states that no amount whatsoever has been paid in satisfaction of the said decree.
2. In these circumstances, we do not find any equity in favour of the appellant. He, therefore, is not entitled to any relief or indulgence. This appeal as consequence is dismissed.