' Abdul Aziz and Munir Ahmad, petitioners, alongwith five others, namely, Nazar Hussain, Mubarak, Manzoor and Qadeer were tried by a learned Magistrate Section 30 at Sheikhupura for causing injuries to Nazir Ahmad, brother of the complainant. By virtue of his judgment, dated 31-5-2000, the learned trial Magistrate found Abdul Aziz and Munir Ahmad guilty of the said charge, convicted Munir under sections 337-F(v), P.P.C. And punished him rigorous imprisonment for three years plus Daman equal to Rs,20,000 or in default thereof to further undergo simple imprisonment for three months. Abdul Aziz petitioner .Was convicted under section 337-F(iv), P.P.C. And was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years with Daman of Rs,20,000 or in default thereof to further undergo simple imprisonment for three months. He was also convicted under section 337-F(i), P.P.C. And was awarded rigorous imprisonment for one year. Both the sentences awarded to Abdul Aziz were ordered to run concurrently. Benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. Was, however, extended to both the convicts. The said learned Magistrate by giving benefit of doubt to their co-accused acquitted them of the charge
2. The said judgment was appealed against by the convicts before learned Sessions Judge, who while maintaining convictions of the appellants dismissed their appeal by virtue of his judgment, dated 30-8-2000. However, conviction of Abdul Aziz appellant under section 337-F(i), P.P.C. Was set aside.
3. By filing this revision petition, the petitioners have called in question conviction and sentences passed against them.
3. During pendency of this petition, an application under section 345, Cr.P.C. Bearing Criminal Miscellaneous No,1695/M of 2001 was moved on behalf of the petitioners praying therein that they be acquitted of the charge on the basis of compromise arrived at between them and the complainant as well as Nazir Ahmad injured.
4. Notice was issued to the State and learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to produce the complainant and the injured P.W. In pursuance of said direction. Nazir Ahmad, injured, has entered appearance. His statement has been recorded on a separate sheet. He stated that the complainant is unable to walk due to his serious illness. He further stated that a compromise has been effected between them and the petitioners and they have compounded the offence after granting them AFW. They bear no objection if the petitioners are acquitted of the charge.
5. After recording statement of Nazir Ahmad injured, I find that the compromise is genuine and voluntary. According to his statement, he has compounded the offence and pray that the petitioners may be acquitted of the charge.
6. 1 am satisfied with regard to the voluntary nature of the statement of Nazir Ahmad and also the voluntary character of the compromise having been arrived at between the parties.
7. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, I accept this revision petition, quash conviction of the petitioners and acquit them of the charge. The petitioners are on bail, so, their bail bonds stand discharge.