1. ' By this criminal revision application, the applicant Soofi Abdul Qadir has assailed the order, dated 13-10-1999 passed by the learned III-Additional Sessions Judge, Khairpur.
2. ' The brief facts of the case are that the applicant/complainant filed direct complaint under section 220, 500, P.P.C. The learned III-Additional Sessions Judge after holding preliminary enquiry, dismissed the complaint by impugned order.
3. ' I have heard the applicant and Mr. Sher Muhammad Shar, learned Assistant Advocate-General, Sindh on behalf of the State. The latter concedes to the prayer of the applicant/complainant and do not support the impugned order. .
4. The perusal of the impugned order shows that no reasons have been assigned by the learned trial Court while dismissing the complaint which is a pre-requisite condition. The reasons must be such which could appeal to a reasonable and prudent mind. The same are lacking in the impugned order.
5. ' Consequently, the revision application is allowed. The case is remanded to the learned trial Court to hold further enquiry into complaint and pass a legal and appropriate order assigning reasons in accordance with law, after examining the record and evidence and hearing the applicant/complainant.
6. ' With these observations, the revision application stands disposed of.