Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2001 YLR 3091

SHAUKAT HAYAT and anothers vs THE STATE

Citation2001 YLR 3091
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No, 2279/B of 2001
Date2001-10-15
Judge(s)Muhammad Farrukh Mehmood
ResultBail granted

ORDER

' Shaukat Hayat son- of Muhammad Yar and Muhammad Jahangir son of Allah Bukhsh, petitioners, have sought their post-arrest bail in a case F.I.R. No,99 of 2001 registered on 20-4-2001 at Police Station Kacha Khu, District Khanewal, for offences under sections 302, 201, 34, P.P.C.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that Wakeel Ahmad brother of the first informant went alongwith the petitioners on 8-4-2001 and thereafter did not return. On 12-4-2001 a dead body was recovered from the canal, which was identified to be that of Wakeel Ahmad. It was stated in the F.I.R. That it was suspected that the petitioners had murdered Wakeel Ahmad, as prior to the occurrence hot words were exchanged between the petitioners and the deceased.

3. After the completion of investigation the petitioners were lodged in the Judicial Lock-up and the challan/report under section 173, Cr.P.C. Has been submitted against the petitioners, wherein they have been placed in Column No,2.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been noticed that only evidence collected against the petitioners is that of having been last seen with the deceased. There is delay of about 12 days in reporting the matter to the Police. No incriminating evidence was collected against the petitioners during investigation. The petitioners were also found to be innocent by the Investigating Officer and this fact was verified by the DSP, Incharge.

5. In these circumstances, the allegation against the petitioners needs further probe and inquiry within the purview of subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C. I am, therefore, inclined to allow this petition and admit the petitioners to bail, subject to their tendering bail bonds in the sum of Rs, One Lac each, with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch