1. ' The applicant has prayed for bail in a case punishable for offences punishable under sections 334, 337-A(i) and 337-L(ii), P.P.C. There are counter-cases between the parties viz. Crime No,6 of 2001, the instant case and the Crime No,7 of 2001 of the same police station. It appears that there was a fight between the parties following cattle trespass. The number of injured persons in the instant case is of course larger but the complainant in the cross case namely the present applicant Rajib has sustained injuries. Co-accused have been granted bail by this Court. Although an injury caused by hatchet has been ascribed to the present applicant, but it seems, the blunt side of the hatchet has been used. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in view of the above it can only be determined at the trial as to which party was aggressor. Mr. Tunio learned Asstt. A.-G.
2. In the aforesaid circumstances did not oppose the bail.
3. ' The above-narrated circumstances make out a case of further inquiry in favour of the applicant and as such he is entitled to bail. The applicant may be released on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs,50,000 and executing P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.